Last year, I went out for drinks with a new hire at Esquire and one of his friends from Vanity Fair. They asked me if I ever thought I might win a National Magazine Award. I told them, as quietly as I could, that I’d won two, including one less than a year earlier. That’s when I realized, No one gives a shit about these things except for you. No one else is keeping score.
But I've always kept score. I don’t know why, exactly. I just know that Gary Smith has won the most National Magazine Awards, with four. I know Tom Junod has won two. William Langewiesche has also won two. I like the validation of their company. I like being able to think, late at night, that maybe I belong.
And that’s why, this morning, when I found out that I hadn’t been nominated for a story I’d written on Roger Ebert, I first took to Twitter to spit the dummy—always a wise and prudent course of action—and then retired to my day bed for an afternoon of dizziness and spells.
All of which is why, when you think you have a chance, as I did with Ebert—when you’ve enjoyed one of those rare instances when everything seems to have worked, when everything feels as though it might fall into place for you—it’s particularly devastating when you find out that you didn’t have a chance all along.
After I got the news this morning, I called my editor, Peter, who said all the right things. It must have been hard for him, having to prop me back up, the little bitch on the phone, but God love him, he did it. We said terrible things. He made me laugh. But really, essentially, he asked me if I would have traded the experience of writing about Roger Ebert for an award. Did that piece not already have its own value to me, independent of hardware?
Of course it does. I wouldn’t trade that story for anything. As hard as it is to write a story that will win a National Magazine Award, it might be just as hard to write a story that changes how you look at your life. I’ll probably never write another story that catches the way that Ebert story did. I’ve worked harder on pieces that earned one-tenth the audience. It was, in every possible way, a perfect experience. I’m happy and grateful to have had that chance.
Philosophy, though, doesn’t take away every last drop of the sting. I can look in the mirror and speak gently to myself all I’d like, but would I still love to be sitting at a table in New York City on May 9th, waiting for someone to open an envelope with my name in it? You’re goddamn right I would.
But I’m hoping that just maybe today’s rapid-fire bolt through the stages of grief—now I’ve reached anger, surprisingly quickly—will make me a better writer. I’m hoping that those sad, disappointed people are right when they inevitably say that everything happens for a reason.
I’ve never met much adversity in my life or my work. I’ve been very fortunate. I’ve been nominated for two National Magazine Awards, and I’ve won them both. I’ve never had that feeling of deflation I had this morning, that venting of jets. Maybe, in some strange way, I needed that.
Maybe I needed to know what it’s like to feel that sick elevator drop in my stomach. Maybe it’s good that, right now, I’m still reeling a little bit, that I’m still pissed off, the steam coming off the top of my head. Because it’s been a long time since I’ve felt so ready to get to work. Suddenly I want to write better than I’ve ever written before. I want to work harder. I still want to win another National Magazine Award, but maybe not quite as much as I did early this morning. Now I want more to be the guy who keeps David Grann awake at night, wondering what’s coming down the chute.
Until today, I always thought that winning was the greatest motivator. I had no idea the fucking gas that comes from a loss.
I don't know if this helps, but hell, you inspire me and a host of other people you don't even know. And we're all jealous, because on a certain level, you're our David Gramm. Shit, some of us don't even write about Big Issues and we still look to you for inspiration.
ReplyDeleteRegardless, this blog and the insight it offers make me feel better about being a writer, being insecure, being the kind of guy who reads other peoples' work and wonders why the hell he even gets out of bed. And I'm told I'm not horrible. (Not great or even good, just not horrible.) An NMA would be nice, but first I'd have to be nominated, and before that, I'd have to write something that kicked ass, and before that, I'd have to do important work for an outlet where my ass-kicking would get noticed. Not saying it isn't going to happen, just that it hasn't happened yet, and that I don't know what it feels like.
So thanks, Chris. If nothing else, the insight helps. I love what you do and how you do it, and I know I'm not alone.
Grann! I meant Grann! Not enough coffee this afternoon. But you get the point.
ReplyDeletewell, i love you anyway.
ReplyDeleteI feel you on this one. I submitted a story for the New England Press Association awards in 2007. Spent 48 hours in Nashua covering the 50th New Hampshire Decathlon. Our kid was a favorite. Great kid. Kind of kid you want your daughter to marry. Supreme athlete and better person. This was his weekend.
ReplyDeleteI put everything I had into those 48 hours. It was dreadful and boiling and humid. I toiled for the kid because I knew he would toil to win that title. I always was impartial, but goddammit I wanted that kid to win.
Anyway, I came back after 48 hours and hurried through the 75- inch story because I had to build the section, too, because I was a one-man kiosk for a weekly. I gave the story as much love as I could under the circumstances. My photos were great and so was the package. The whole thing was fucking awesome. It was THE story of stories among the state scribes who were there. Take away the photos and pagination, and the words rung the truest and fairest.
I submitted that week's section and that story. Section took 2nd in New England. I was pleased. Story took 2nd or 3rd, and 4 years later I still wonder why. Easy: someone else was better. I wish I had 6 more hours with that story. 6 more hours.
But I can't dwell because I got to cover this kid for 48 of the most intense sporting hours of his life. We were there together, dying under the 92-degree Nashua sun, doing what we both loved doing.
I covered the runner-up ike a champion. I'm good with that.
And, of course, I have to have fucking typo at the end of it.
ReplyDeleteGoogling David Grann. Reading Chris Jones.
ReplyDeleteI'll give you my standard advice, which I give everyone and helps no one:
ReplyDeleteBuck up little Buckaroo!
See, told you it wasn't helpful. In fact, it's got me in all sorts of trouble with my more sensitive friends. Still, I feel the compulsion to be bright and cheery in the face of real pain--hmm, that probably says something about me, eh?
I haven't read every article eligible for the award, but that Ebert piece was fucking gold.
That Ebert piece is perfection. The structure, the wording, the underlying message. We learn about Roger Ebert, but we learn about ourselves. His translucent skin which you describe so well is but a metaphor for the peeling away of his voice, which was the instrument that led to his success. What follows shows us who we really are.
ReplyDeleteWhat I was most worried about when I saw you hadn't been nominated was that you might think you could have done something differently on this piece. PLEASE DON'T THINK THAT. It's perfection. Just as Roger Ebert can't be silenced, your writing voice shouldn't be either. Can't wait to see your next piece of work.
Ebert story is something transcendent. Reading it is almost a religious experience. Chris Jones is vulnerable, and that makes the story beautiful.
ReplyDeleteI read this with some consternation, then wrote a bunch of stuff.
ReplyDeleteIt bothers me that you see the process as unified, from story idea to judge panel. David Simon complains about the awards culture brought to the Sun, but that's not it entirely -- they also produced good stories. So what he's complaining about, in part, is the ethos behind the stories, the motivation for treasure over something perhaps more noble and less easily defined.
If that sounds like a lot of self-indulgent tripe, well, it is. So is this blog post, and so is this comment. But there seems to me to ultimately be a choice between the kind of journalism you want to produce, about the master you serve. Is it the public, even as that sounds so silly? Or is it your own view of yourself, even as that sounds so pathetic?
Ultimately, what rubs me the wrong way about this is that it's about the accumulation of capital, if of a different sort. Were we investment bankers or bass fishermen or sports agents, it would be more obvious but no less nakedly ambitious.
And maybe that's what it is about this post that drives me up a wall. Why not simply go back to school for finance and focus on making money? If accumulation is the end goal here, then go somewhere where your winnings can be hoarded and displayed, where no Esquire writer will question how well you've done -- your private jet makes the question redundant. That's an exaggeration, but not much of one. We can bitch about Beltway journalists and the insider-y nature of Washington reporting and the clamoring for recognition, but here it is in a forum in which I never expected to see it, being put on by a writer I have come to respect.
I appreciate that you're not putting on airs here. This is your personal blog and it's good to get a glimpse into the mind of a writer who's done so well. But now, I'm just depressed. Fucking depressed, actually, because this means that just as there are award-hungry people in newsrooms, there are much of the same at American journalism's highest levels. Moreover, there are not enough points of encouragement along the way to make a writer feel secure in himself, such that he throws his sense of self worth at the feet of a panel of judges even after TWO FUCKING WINS!
I'd like to think none of us cares about awards. Of course that's not true. And there are some of us who are perennial winners, some of us who nab one once in a while, and the rest who have decided against submitting them because it seems pointless.
Chris, you obviously exist in a realm apart from state newspaper awards and internal-memo glory. NMAs, the magazine equivalent of Pulitzers, are something to be revered. But here, I see them treated as something you could get if only ... What? If only the judges had thought differently? If only the prose had been more crisp? If only your editor had added or cut or done whatever it is that magazine editors do? What does this kind of worrying achieve? And how does it make your next story better?
That's the last bit. The bit about coming around in the end and finding new motivation. I will never question another writer's motivation, as I sometimes find it difficult to uncover it in myself. And there's this faint glimmer of hope at the end, where you feel as though you want to keep Grann awake at night.
I understand that. And I don't know how David Grann feels about awards -- I wouldn't presume to guess. But I do read his stories, not as potential contest entries (something I do, frequently, with newspaper stories) but as a biopsy of time.
I'll wrap this up. I reject the simple accumulation of capital in journalism, and I reject the notion that we are defined by the awards we win.
I had previously been swimming along quite peacefully. Perhaps it worries me that there are sharks in the water.
This blog is not about writing and words; it's about you and how great you are. Better to remain silent and thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
ReplyDeleteMaybe more than anything else, that's the difference between you and David Grann.
You're a beautiful writer. At some point, you'll learn that awards really don't matter, and that they often go to people who don't really deserve it, and some of the very, very best writing on the planet goes completely unnoticed.
ReplyDeleteDon't discount the many people who appreciate your writing for the opinions of some who don't - or didn't, quite enough, just this once. Just because your average reader can't give you an award, they don't matter as much? Their high praise doesn't lift you up at all? It doesn't mitigate the pain and grief you feel at not winning your, uhm, THIRD National Magazine Award?
Focus on what matters. That's what will make you a better writer.
I dunno. I think it's kinda brave to admit you have an ego that you want stroked. Part of the fun of writing for me is saying the things other people think but are afraid of looking bad if they say it. Hey, this is me. Take it or leave it. I find I'm left with some pretty genuine, interesting people around me. Stiff upper lips and all that just aren't very interesting.
ReplyDeleteHey Jonesy, You've got nothing to be ashamed of. Though I've never won a writing award in my life, I've nominated myself for some in the last few years. My rational mind doesn't expect to win. My rational mind puts writing awards in the same category as Olympic swimming medals or maybe those ones Leia gives Luke, Han and Chewey at the end of Star Wars, but I always come up with a fantasy to harbor where everything breaks in my favor, and I'm always disappointed, but this is the part that makes it worse: I only care about the money. I keep getting my hopes up because I can't think of any other way to pull my family out of the 401k-burning debt spiral of freelance journalism. I've nominated my own shit for feature writing pulitzers the last two years and livington awards until I turned 35, like Jason Robards' hopeless son going back to the craps table in Parenthood. Beat that!
ReplyDeleteps Here's who, besides me, should be ashamed: Visitors to this blog haven't heard of David Grann? If you don't got Mojo Nixon, man, your store could use some fixin'....
pps The Ebert profile belongs alongside Wallace on Federer, Gilbert on Williams, Smith on Ferreras and few others, but you know that.
Hey, guys. Thanks for the kind words, and for the admonishment, too. I went and worked on the house today, and as I was strapping walls and pulling wires, I was thinking about yesterday and felt a little sheepish about everything. But as I wrote on Twitter, all I can say is, I wish I didn't care so much about these things, and I was only being honest. More than anything else, I want this blog to be true.
ReplyDeleteNigel, sorry your post didn't appear until a little while ago. It got caught in the spam filter for reasons I can't explain. I like that it's followed by Anonymous Number Dickbag and his "Better to remain silent" pap. It's a good study in contrast.
Because your comment is exactly the sort of comment I hoped for when I started this thing. You've proved that it's possible to make The Case Against without resorting to snark and bomb-throwing behind the veil of anonymity. You make a totally reasonable point in a lucid, well-written way, and it only made me wish I were more like you. I wish I could reject the accumulation of capital, too.
In my defense, and I should have written this in the blog: Part of the joy of the NMAs for me is the night itself. I don't get to see the people I work with very often; all the writers are flung far afield. If we get an NMA nod, we get flown into New York and put up at a nice hotel. My wife comes, which is fun. We all go out for a big dinner the night before, and then the night of, we sit there in our suits and have a few drinks and then, win or lose, we go tear up a bar and sing into the night. It's really, really fun. And when you win, it's even more fun. Because winning feels good. It's validating and all those things, but most of all, it just feels good.
And that's why winning one didn't end my appetite. If anything, it made it worse. Because I knew how good it felt, and I wanted to feel that way again. It's so rare, a night like that, that this time around, when I thought I had a pretty good chance to be nominated, I made the mistake of really looking forward to it. (Unlike how it was presented on Poynter, I didn't think I was going to win; I was sure that Rolling Stone's McCrystal story would win, but as it turns out, it's been nominated in a different category). When my dreams for that night were so quickly erased, I was upset about it.
What I'm trying to say is, winning awards for me is less about the accumulation of capital, and more about the accumulation of good feeling. I got that in so many other ways with this story, and like I said in the post, I wouldn't trade that for anything, including a trophy. But if a trophy had closed out the deal, I would have liked that. I would have liked carrying a copper elephant into a bar in New York and drinking the night away with friends. I have a hard time believing that anyone wouldn't.
Jim Sheeler spoke to my journalism students on Monday night. He talked about Final Salute, and one of the students asked him what it was like to win the Pulitzer Prize for the story. He talked about how he was just as happy for the families of the soldiers he wrote about as he was for himself, because the award validated what they had been through.
ReplyDeleteI wonder, and this is most likely complete psycho-analysis bullshit here, but I wonder how much Chris's feelings toward Ebert come into play here too. In a way, it's not just Chris's story about Ebert that is getting rejected, but Ebert himself. And having read how much the entire experience of getting to know Ebert has impacted Chris, surely he has a connection to Ebert, one that would make him feel like crap and be pissed off by the fact that Joan Rivers made the cut but Ebert didn't.
Chris, I was shocked, and bummed, when I saw your story got snubbed. If it's any consolation, I truly believe your Ebert profile will endure. People will be reading it for a long, long time. Enjoying it, too.
ReplyDeleteNow, enough with all the knocks against bass fishermen!
This is why I loathe Esquire. The tone of arrogance and narcissism throughout the book is nauseating. It's like you, Junod, Jacobs and the other ego-driven males sit in Granger's office, whip out your johnsons and stroke each other off. Graphic to be sure, but that's the way it reads. Only Sager gets a pass as he once proudly told me: "I'm not one of Granger's butt buddies"
ReplyDeleteI read your piece, like tens of others: good, not great. You have two, why do you really care? It's not like you'll be hurting for work. And don't feed me the line about it being all about Roger Ebert. Bullshit. It's all about you and your wild ego.
But here's the reality check: In the long run, do you know what a National Magazine Award gets you? Not. A Goddamn. Thing.
I admire your cajones for admitting you're disappointed, but you come across as a pathetic whiner. Get over yourself.
Sorry, Alexander, can you start again? I was too busy trying to get Scott Raab's pants undone.
ReplyDeleteCome on, Jones: Just put a little Crisco around Raab's waist, and the pants slide right down.
ReplyDeleteThis is why I, oh, forget it....buy in bulk and save!
ReplyDeletehttp://www.amazon.com/Crisco-Pure-Vegetable-32-Ounce-Pack/dp/B0045TKIB8/ref=sr_1_26?s=grocery&ie=UTF8&qid=1302201188&sr=1-26
I can't tell you how much I love your honesty. Like another favourite of mine, Stephen Fry, I find so much to relate to in some of your most honest and possibly less flattering writings. It's a huge relief to know that I'm not alone.
ReplyDeleteIllegitimi non carborundum.
One of the wonderful things about Chris is that in all things he's honest and says what he believes, not what he thinks people want to hear. It's part of that fearlessness that makes his work great.
ReplyDeleteI would have bet money you'd win. Awards panels are quirky. I think some folks go into it thinking it's someone else's turn.
Chris, your honesty and frankness are inspiring. Same with you, Brick. Awards do mean something, even if they shouldn't. And winning them early has got to be as much a curse as a blessing. When I saw the nominations, I thought I must have had the year wrong on the Ebert story. Figured it must have been at the end of '09. You have to think the judges just figure you'll be around to win for at least 20 years.
ReplyDeleteAlso, this post is just one more example of how this blog should be turned into a book. Just drop it right down on the page, call it "Son of Bold Venture." Please. You owe it to all the people who can't just pour out these incredible, high-minded thoughts. This will be the most readable -- and most honest -- writing textbook ever produced.
I wish my name hadn't been invoked here. I can think of no aspect of writing that I find less worthy or interesting.
ReplyDeletePart of that attitude is no doubt based on the fact that I've never won awards.
Part of that attitude is no doubt based on what winning awards has done to some of my friends and colleagues.
Part (I'd like to think it's a big part) of that attitude is based on my own struggle to make a living writing.
Ever read Ironweed? One of the greatest novels I've ever read. I sat in a class one day and heard William Kennedy talk about rewriting that motherfucker as it made the rounds, rejected by publisher after publisher. Took YEARS to get it done, YEARS to get it published.
I can't take this shit seriously after that. Sorry. I take the work seriously -- my work, Chris's work, Junod's work. But taking this shit seriously? No.
I'ma post a link to my own blog. I didn't write the entry about this thing in particular. But if the shoe fits...
http://www.scottraab.com/2011/04/08/try-selling-shoes/
Not sure what to tell you, Scott. I've never complained about my job, not once, not ever, to you or to anyone else. And I've sold things, too. Underground sprinkler systems. SCUBA gear. Tickets to the circus.
ReplyDeleteBut I'm not going to apologize or feel embarrassed for feeling a particular way. That's like apologizing for my favorite color or why I write. I mean, who can judge anyone for that?
Here's how I look at: If winning an award makes you happy—and I really find it hard to believe that anyone really, truly doesn't give a shit whether their work is recognized or not—then why is it so wrong to be disappointed when you don't?
When you want to win, losing sucks. What a revelation.
Not that complicated, Chris.
ReplyDeleteIt has nothing to do with feelings, with wanting to win or being pissed off about not winning.
It's about making a big deal of it. Making a big deal of it is bullshit.
You mean writing a blog about it, Scott? This blog is about all aspects of the writing life. Disappointment is one of them. I've received several emails from kids passed over for Hearst Awards, for instance, and they feel better for having read this, which makes me feel good. Plus, it made me feel better to write it. I can't be sorry for that.
ReplyDeleteLooking forward to reading your blog, and your book, Scott. I hope it sells a million copies.
Good work: Good. Whether or not it wins awards.
ReplyDeleteAwards for good work: Good, but beside the point.
Hunger for said awards: Bad, which seems to be what Chris's post is about.
Hunger for awards as motivation for good work: Awful. The WORST. At least to the extent that you're producing what's likely to win awards, as opposed to producing good work. There's occasionally some coincidental overlap between the two, but most of the time they're completely different. That's David Simon's point.
Self-deprecating honesty about all this: Seems to have generated a worthwhile conversation that doesn't happen in public too often.
Anyone who's read this far in the thread should probably go ahead and read Ryne Sandberg's Hall of Fame induction speech ...
http://www.cubsnet.com/node/526
... and "You and Your Research," a talk given at Bell Labs by Richard Hamming ...
http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html
... they're the smartest voices that I've run into on this particular conversation. One that's worth having.
Ahhhrhrhghgghh, I can't help myself from quoting Ryno on this...
ReplyDelete"A lot of people say this honor validates my career, but I didn't work hard for validation. I didn't play the game right because I saw a reward at the end of the tunnel. I played it right because that's what you're supposed to do, play it right and with respect."
As a performer, I consider myself lucky to make a living doing what I love and what I'm best at. That doesn't mean I wouldn't love the validation of being awarded something by my peers.
ReplyDeleteSeems natural to me. I envy the people who can genuinely not give a shit.
"Until today, I always thought that winning was the greatest motivator. I had no idea the fucking gas that comes from a loss."
ReplyDeleteSuccess after a failure is always the sweetest reward. It's the satisfaction of (finally) beating the bastards.
Update: I did not win the Pulitzer Prize (actual pre-tax value: $10,000.00). Also, HEB continues to charge a surprisingly robust price for the diapers with the pictures of Lightning McQueen on them.
ReplyDeleteonce i didn't win an award. but i didn't have a blog.
ReplyDelete